From 46aec5fee0fc76c8ac84c95b2d52cb0608c8a396 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Lewis <22850972+BradLewis@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 17:12:35 -0400
Subject: Correctly resolve implicit selectors within a binary expr within a
 call expr

---
 src/server/analysis.odin | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src')

diff --git a/src/server/analysis.odin b/src/server/analysis.odin
index 41c78d8..3c896fe 100644
--- a/src/server/analysis.odin
+++ b/src/server/analysis.odin
@@ -2301,6 +2301,16 @@ resolve_implicit_selector :: proc(
 	Symbol,
 	bool,
 ) {
+	if position_context.binary != nil {
+		if position_in_node(position_context.binary, position_context.position) {
+			// We resolve whichever is not the implicit_selector
+			if implicit, ok := position_context.binary.left.derived.(^ast.Implicit_Selector_Expr); ok {
+				return resolve_type_expression(ast_context, position_context.binary.right)
+			}
+			return resolve_type_expression(ast_context, position_context.binary.left)
+		}
+	}
+
 	if position_context.call != nil {
 		if call, ok := position_context.call.derived.(^ast.Call_Expr); ok {
 			parameter_index, parameter_ok := find_position_in_call_param(position_context, call^)
@@ -2334,16 +2344,6 @@ resolve_implicit_selector :: proc(
 		}
 	}
 
-	if position_context.binary != nil {
-		if position_in_node(position_context.binary, position_context.position) {
-			// We resolve whichever is not the implicit_selector
-			if implicit, ok := position_context.binary.left.derived.(^ast.Implicit_Selector_Expr); ok {
-				return resolve_type_expression(ast_context, position_context.binary.right)
-			}
-			return resolve_type_expression(ast_context, position_context.binary.left)
-		}
-	}
-
 	if position_context.index != nil {
 		symbol: Symbol
 		ok := false
-- 
cgit v1.2.3