From 46aec5fee0fc76c8ac84c95b2d52cb0608c8a396 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Lewis <22850972+BradLewis@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 17:12:35 -0400
Subject: Correctly resolve implicit selectors within a binary expr within a
 call expr

---
 tests/hover_test.odin | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

(limited to 'tests')

diff --git a/tests/hover_test.odin b/tests/hover_test.odin
index 341b641..08c6870 100644
--- a/tests/hover_test.odin
+++ b/tests/hover_test.odin
@@ -5179,6 +5179,24 @@ ast_hover_using_import_statement_name_conflict :: proc(t: ^testing.T) {
 	}
 	test.expect_hover(t, &source, "my_package.Bar :: struct {\n\tb: string,\n}")
 }
+
+@(test)
+ast_hover_enum_in_bitset_within_call_expr :: proc(t: ^testing.T) {
+	source := test.Source {
+		main = `package test
+		Foo :: enum {A, B}
+		Foos :: bit_set[Foo]
+
+		bar :: proc(a: bool) {}
+
+		main :: proc() {
+			foos: Foos
+			bar(.A{*} in foos)
+		}
+		`,
+	}
+	test.expect_hover(t, &source, "test.Foo: .A")
+}
 /*
 
 Waiting for odin fix
-- 
cgit v1.2.3