Unify `AstTernaryExpr` with `AstTernaryIfExpr`

Allow for both syntaxes `x if cond else y` and `cond ? x : y`
Removes the confusing semantics behind `?:` which could be `if` or `when` depending on the context.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/src/check_type.cpp b/src/check_type.cpp
index f70230682..b90732e00 100644
--- a/src/check_type.cpp
+++ b/src/check_type.cpp
@@ -2889,16 +2889,6 @@ bool check_type_internal(CheckerContext *ctx, Ast *e, Type **type, Type *named_t
 		}
 	case_end;
 
-	case_ast_node(te, TernaryExpr, e);
-		Operand o = {};
-		check_expr_or_type(ctx, &o, e);
-		if (o.mode == Addressing_Type) {
-			*type = o.type;
-			set_base_type(named_type, *type);
-			return true;
-		}
-	case_end;
-
 	case_ast_node(te, TernaryIfExpr, e);
 		Operand o = {};
 		check_expr_or_type(ctx, &o, e);