aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/checker/statements.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorgingerBill <ginger.bill.22@gmail.com>2016-07-09 00:31:57 +0100
committergingerBill <ginger.bill.22@gmail.com>2016-07-09 00:31:57 +0100
commitf7a669d342c96451a3e0be84e2e51af8631f90ec (patch)
treec0c81ed66c8229c182bac13ef8107ca642debd74 /src/checker/statements.cpp
parent9ba2a6d02cab3feff9d70f7bb9c2e8eb72bc5533 (diff)
Initial release version
* Code cleanup * Fix some TODOs * Reduce heap allocation use and replace with arena allocation
Diffstat (limited to 'src/checker/statements.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/checker/statements.cpp72
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/src/checker/statements.cpp b/src/checker/statements.cpp
index 15a0904a6..a7c72d7f0 100644
--- a/src/checker/statements.cpp
+++ b/src/checker/statements.cpp
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-//
+// Statements and Declarations
-b32 check_assignable_to(Checker *c, Operand *operand, Type *type) {
+b32 check_is_assignable_to(Checker *c, Operand *operand, Type *type) {
if (operand->mode == Addressing_Invalid ||
type == &basic_types[Basic_Invalid]) {
return true;
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ b32 check_assignable_to(Checker *c, Operand *operand, Type *type) {
// NOTE(bill): `content_name` is for debugging
+// TODO(bill): Maybe allow assignment to tuples?
void check_assignment(Checker *c, Operand *operand, Type *type, String context_name) {
check_not_tuple(c, operand);
if (operand->mode == Addressing_Invalid)
@@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ void check_assignment(Checker *c, Operand *operand, Type *type, String context_n
}
if (type != NULL) {
- if (!check_assignable_to(c, operand, type)) {
+ if (!check_is_assignable_to(c, operand, type)) {
gbString type_string = type_to_string(type);
gbString op_type_string = type_to_string(operand->type);
defer (gb_string_free(type_string));
@@ -90,9 +91,9 @@ void check_assignment(Checker *c, Operand *operand, Type *type, String context_n
}
-Type *check_assign_variable(Checker *c, Operand *x, AstNode *lhs) {
- if (x->mode == Addressing_Invalid ||
- x->type == &basic_types[Basic_Invalid]) {
+Type *check_assign_variable(Checker *c, Operand *op_a, AstNode *lhs) {
+ if (op_a->mode == Addressing_Invalid ||
+ op_a->type == &basic_types[Basic_Invalid]) {
return NULL;
}
@@ -102,10 +103,10 @@ Type *check_assign_variable(Checker *c, Operand *x, AstNode *lhs) {
if (node->kind == AstNode_Identifier &&
are_strings_equal(node->identifier.token.string, make_string("_"))) {
add_entity_definition(c, node, NULL);
- check_assignment(c, x, NULL, make_string("assignment to `_` identifier"));
- if (x->mode == Addressing_Invalid)
+ check_assignment(c, op_a, NULL, make_string("assignment to `_` identifier"));
+ if (op_a->mode == Addressing_Invalid)
return NULL;
- return x->type;
+ return op_a->type;
}
Entity *e = NULL;
@@ -119,41 +120,42 @@ Type *check_assign_variable(Checker *c, Operand *x, AstNode *lhs) {
}
- Operand y = {Addressing_Invalid};
- check_expression(c, &y, lhs);
+ Operand op_b = {Addressing_Invalid};
+ check_expression(c, &op_b, lhs);
if (e) e->variable.used = used;
- if (y.mode == Addressing_Invalid ||
- y.type == &basic_types[Basic_Invalid]) {
+ if (op_b.mode == Addressing_Invalid ||
+ op_b.type == &basic_types[Basic_Invalid]) {
return NULL;
}
- switch (y.mode) {
+ switch (op_b.mode) {
case Addressing_Variable:
break;
case Addressing_Invalid:
return NULL;
default: {
- if (y.expression->kind == AstNode_SelectorExpression) {
+ if (op_b.expression->kind == AstNode_SelectorExpression) {
// NOTE(bill): Extra error checks
- Operand z = {Addressing_Invalid};
- check_expression(c, &z, y.expression->selector_expression.operand);
+ Operand op_c = {Addressing_Invalid};
+ check_expression(c, &op_c, op_b.expression->selector_expression.operand);
}
- gbString str = expression_to_string(y.expression);
+ gbString str = expression_to_string(op_b.expression);
defer (gb_string_free(str));
- print_checker_error(c, ast_node_token(y.expression),
+ print_checker_error(c, ast_node_token(op_b.expression),
"Cannot assign to `%s`", str);
} break;
}
- check_assignment(c, x, y.type, make_string("assignment"));
- if (x->mode == Addressing_Invalid)
+ check_assignment(c, op_a, op_b.type, make_string("assignment"));
+ if (op_a->mode == Addressing_Invalid)
return NULL;
- return x->type;
+ return op_a->type;
}
+// TODO(bill): Do I need to pass the *_count?
void check_assign_variables(Checker *c,
AstNode *lhs_list, isize lhs_count,
AstNode *rhs_list, isize rhs_count) {
@@ -312,6 +314,10 @@ void check_statement_list(Checker *c, AstNode *node) {
check_statement(c, node);
}
+
+// NOTE(bill): The last expression has to be a `return` statement
+// TODO(bill): This is a mild hack and should be probably handled
+// TODO(bill): Warn/err against code after `return` that it won't be executed
b32 check_is_terminating(Checker *c, AstNode *node);
b32 check_is_terminating_list(Checker *c, AstNode *node_list) {
@@ -545,14 +551,12 @@ void check_statement(Checker *c, AstNode *node) {
// Declarations
case AstNode_VariableDeclaration: {
auto *vd = &node->variable_declaration;
- gbAllocator allocator = gb_arena_allocator(&c->entity_arena);
-
isize entity_count = vd->name_list_count;
isize entity_index = 0;
- Entity **entities = gb_alloc_array(allocator, Entity *, entity_count);
+ Entity **entities = gb_alloc_array(c->allocator, Entity *, entity_count);
switch (vd->kind) {
case Declaration_Mutable: {
- Entity **new_entities = gb_alloc_array(allocator, Entity *, entity_count);
+ Entity **new_entities = gb_alloc_array(c->allocator, Entity *, entity_count);
isize new_entity_count = 0;
for (AstNode *name = vd->name_list; name != NULL; name = name->next) {
@@ -564,7 +568,7 @@ void check_statement(Checker *c, AstNode *node) {
// NOTE(bill): Ignore assignments to `_`
b32 can_be_ignored = are_strings_equal(str, make_string("_"));
if (!can_be_ignored) {
- found = scope_lookup_entity_current(c->curr_scope, str);
+ found = current_scope_lookup_entity(c->curr_scope, str);
}
if (found == NULL) {
entity = make_entity_variable(c, c->curr_scope, token, NULL);
@@ -650,14 +654,16 @@ void check_statement(Checker *c, AstNode *node) {
case AstNode_ProcedureDeclaration: {
auto *pd = &node->procedure_declaration;
GB_ASSERT_MSG(pd->kind == Declaration_Immutable, "Mutable/temp procedures are not yet implemented");
- // TODO(bill): Should this be the case? And are the scopes correct?
- // TODO(bill): Should procedures just have global scope?
Entity *e = make_entity_procedure(c, c->curr_scope, pd->name->identifier.token, NULL);
add_entity(c, c->curr_scope, pd->name, e);
- Type *proc_type = make_type_procedure(e->parent, NULL, 0, NULL, 0);
+ Type *proc_type = make_type_procedure(c->allocator, e->parent, NULL, 0, NULL, 0);
e->type = proc_type;
+ // NOTE(bill): Procedures are just in file scope only.
+ // This is because closures/lambdas are not supported yet (or maybe never)
+ Scope *origin_curr_scope = c->curr_scope;
+ c->curr_scope = c->file_scope;
check_open_scope(c, pd->procedure_type);
{
check_procedure_type(c, proc_type, pd->procedure_type);
@@ -676,12 +682,14 @@ void check_statement(Checker *c, AstNode *node) {
GB_ASSERT(pd->tag->kind == AstNode_TagExpression);
String tag_name = pd->tag->tag_expression.name.string;
- if (gb_strncmp("foreign", cast(char *)tag_name.text, tag_name.len) == 0) {
+ if (are_strings_equal(tag_name, make_string("foreign"))) {
// NOTE(bill): Foreign procedure (linking stage)
}
+ // TODO(bill): Other tags
}
}
check_close_scope(c);
+ c->curr_scope = origin_curr_scope;
} break;
@@ -691,7 +699,7 @@ void check_statement(Checker *c, AstNode *node) {
Entity *e = make_entity_type_name(c, c->curr_scope, name->identifier.token, NULL);
add_entity(c, c->curr_scope, name, e);
- e->type = make_type_named(e->token.string, NULL, e);
+ e->type = make_type_named(c->allocator, e->token.string, NULL, e);
check_type(c, td->type_expression, e->type);
// NOTE(bill): Prevent recursive definition
set_base_type(e->type, get_base_type(e->type));